lama_byterun/runtime/TODO.md

### TODO list

- [x] Fix heap&stack&extra_roots dump
- [x] Remove extra and dead code
- [x] Debug print -> DEBUG_PRINT mode
- [x] Check `mmap`/`remap`/...
- [x] Check: `__gc_stack_bot`: same issue as `__gc_stack_top`?
- [x] Check: Can we get rid of `__gc_init` (as an assembly (implement in C instead))? (answer: if we make main in which every Lama file is compiled set `__gc_stack_bottom` to current `ebp` then yes, otherwise we need access to registers)
- [x] Check: runtime tags: should always the last bit be 1? (Answer: not really, however, we still need to distinguish between 5 different options (because unboxed values should have its own value to be returned from `LkindOf`))
- [x] Fix warnings in ML code
- [x] TODO: debug flag doesn't compile
- [x] Sexp: move the tag to be `contents[0]` instead of the word in sexp header; i.e. get rid of sexp as separate data structure
- [x] Run Lama compiler on Lama
- [ ] Add more stress tests (for graph-like structures) to `stdlib/regression` and unit tests
- [ ] Magic constants
- [ ] Normal documentation: a-la doxygen
- [ ] Think: normal debug mode
- [ ] Fix warnings in C code
- [ ] Modes (like FULL_INVARIANTS) -> separate files
Removed extra word in sexp 2023-08-09 20:16:51 +02:00			`### TODO list`

			`- [x] Fix heap&stack&extra_roots dump`
			`- [x] Remove extra and dead code`
			`- [x] Debug print -> DEBUG_PRINT mode`
			- [x] Check `mmap`/`remap`/...
			- [x] Check: `__gc_stack_bot`: same issue as `__gc_stack_top`?
			- [x] Check: Can we get rid of `__gc_init` (as an assembly (implement in C instead))? (answer: if we make main in which every Lama file is compiled set `__gc_stack_bottom` to current `ebp` then yes, otherwise we need access to registers)
			- [x] Check: runtime tags: should always the last bit be 1? (Answer: not really, however, we still need to distinguish between 5 different options (because unboxed values should have its own value to be returned from `LkindOf`))
			`- [x] Fix warnings in ML code`
			`- [x] TODO: debug flag doesn't compile`
			- [x] Sexp: move the tag to be `contents[0]` instead of the word in sexp header; i.e. get rid of sexp as separate data structure
Fixed unit tests + fixed different compilation flags' combinations so that code compiles and works properly + added unit tests execution into a github actions workflow 2023-09-27 03:45:58 +02:00			`- [x] Run Lama compiler on Lama`
Added new todo to run Lama compiler on Lama 2023-08-09 20:23:07 +02:00			- [ ] Add more stress tests (for graph-like structures) to `stdlib/regression` and unit tests
Removed extra word in sexp 2023-08-09 20:16:51 +02:00			`- [ ] Magic constants`
			`- [ ] Normal documentation: a-la doxygen`
			`- [ ] Think: normal debug mode`
			`- [ ] Fix warnings in C code`
			`- [ ] Modes (like FULL_INVARIANTS) -> separate files`